Superdata images
These are simply the best
Cydonia hyperspectral images made so far, processed extra specially with data extracted from
the "real" and "official" image versions of controversial acclaim.
20020724 as it should have
been displayed
Click image for high res
These are individually stunning.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
These next images are large
Cydonia overlays from the processed straight "real" image; they are
aesthetically pleasing and revealing in their raw super enlarged hyperspectral
intensity.
1. 6.62-8.56B
7.88-9.30G 11.78-12.58R
2.
6.62-9.30B 7.88-10.11G 9.30-11.03R
3. 6.62-10.11B
7.88-11.03G 9.30-12.58R
4. 7.88-8.56B
9.30-10.11G 11.78-12.58R
5. 7.88-10.11B
9.30-11.03G 10.11-11.78R
6. 9.30-11.03B 10.11-11.78G 11.03-12.58R
Here is a 3d perspective of this fantastic area.
Face Overlays
D+M Overlays
Face and D+M
These are the IR overlay images that made the
experts gasp.
Teotihuacan.. via ASTER
Yes Noel, there ARE anomalies down there.
The "Official" image
So as not to be considered to have neglected the
"official" image being processed singularly and overlain with the same process
this is three images made from it. Note the noise and "blockies"
So here we see in this imaging review of all the data
that I have taken consideration to process not only the more recent october PDS
image release of an image covering much the same area, but also the July Cydonia
infrared"real" and "official" images. To add
a further observation to this I have also merged both real and official
datasets with results that are better than any so far achieved. When you
factor in the images also here from various other locations and the results are
reviewed we can at least see that the data and processes are consistent.
As I process the other Cydonia releases of this area
and when newer contexting datasets arrive in .qub format to
the PDS the study on this specific area will continue. Let's keep our fingers
crossed and hold on, it will no doubt be a rough journey
For those of you wishing for the true story of how
all the varied controversies around this image
came to be instead of the many idiotic misinterpretations available on certain
schlock BBS' and articles, read
Timeline, Testimony, Processing, and Politics of a
Bad Themis Image
The Saga
Continues
"Anomalist/Geologist's" Test of "Real" Image Fails Under
Analysis
Mr Steve Wingate of Anomalous images,
author of defaming and inaccurate articles,
http://www.anomalous-images.com/Odyssey/TEM_hoax.html.
I invite you to watch me take his
"analysis" apart
Proof Steve Wingate Did
Not Prove TEM Image Was Hoaxed
but then again, Steve Wingate also
knows where all the underground UFO bases on earth are too... http://www.v-j-enterprises.com/undgmap.html
Dr Mark Carlotto, please learn how to
register images and at least rudimentarily learn some IR imaging techniques, we
all expect better of you! Your SFS work is magnificent, but this article is
straight nonsense.
http://www.newfrontiersinscience.com/ArchiveIndex/v01n03/enterprise.shtml
The original image that the bands were taken from can be
located here in JPEG.
Sorry folks, but I'm not NASA, I can't afford to supply the
tiff.
20020724A
Hellas IR images!
Or.. no Blockine zone
(well, maybe a couple)
The area covered in these images is
long a favorite of mine, hailing images of places such as Artville and Hellas
City Watershed. I have long held that this place contains many fantastic
anomalies. Let's hope they continue close coverage.
I01283002
5-6 3-4 1-3
5-7 3-5 1-3
I00835002
Close up of anomalous area on I00835002
Below is another marvelous
East Hellas image, I01683003
click on image for high res
bands 9-6-3
